Training paid by your boss: do you have to pay the money back?
Training financed by the employer is a benefit, until the contract says you have to repay the costs if you leave. But such repayment clauses are not automatically valid: they must be fair and clearly regulated.
Reach your next steps and the matching ready-made texts in just a few minutes, free of charge:
Have the clause checked →Your chances of getting your money back
What you should do now
- 1
1. Check the clause
Is there a specific repayment rule in the contract with a staggered, decreasing repayment?
- 2
2. Check the proportionality
Does the binding period match the length and value of the training (reasonableness)?
- 3
3. Check the reason for termination
Does the clause differentiate by the reason for ending the employment? If not, it is often invalid.
- 4
4. Reject the demand
If the clause is invalid, reject the repayment demand in writing (get advice if necessary).
Frequently asked questions
Do I have to repay training costs paid by the employer?
Only if a valid repayment clause has been agreed. It is valid if the training gives you a monetary benefit, the binding period is reasonable (short training equals short binding) and the clause differentiates by the reason for ending the employment. Unclear or overly far-reaching clauses are invalid; then you do not have to pay.
How long can a repayment clause bind me?
That depends on the length and value of the training. Case law requires a reasonable staggering: the shorter the training, the shorter the permissible binding period, for example, for several months of training, as a rule at most around one to two years. In addition, the repayment must decrease proportionally over the binding period.
Take action now
We put together the ready-made texts and the right places to contact for you.
General information for self-help, not legal advice (RDG). In case of a high loss or uncertainty: contact a consumer advice center or a lawyer.